C3 with 1964 knock offs

Nassau65

CCCUK Member
Here’s a 1975 corvette with the 1964 style Knock off wheels fitted.

Is that a yes or no.?

I’m on the fence on this one.

IMG_0014.jpeg
 

Nassau65

CCCUK Member
The black certainly makes the fin edges/ends stand out. I like both styles myself. The only problem with the 64 style is that the bare finish shows all the dirt more than the 65/66 does.
Didn’t mention the 63, as no knock offs were officially fitted to the 63 model year, but thousands have them fitted now, both replica and original 1964 wheels, bought over the counter at Chevrolet and fitted back in the day.
 

Mr. Cricket

Committee Member
The black certainly makes the fin edges/ends stand out. I like both styles myself. The only problem with the 64 style is that the bare finish shows all the dirt more than the 65/66 does.
Didn’t mention the 63, as no knock offs were officially fitted to the 63 model year, but thousands have them fitted now, both replica and original 1964 wheels, bought over the counter at Chevrolet and fitted back in the day.
Yes porosity issues prevented '63 KO's being offered. The previous image I posted are of some I had diamond cut and powder coated and are on the silver '65 now. They were bare cast so '64 and yes the dirt and brake dust was baked into the rough texture and try as I did they couldn't be cleaned to any decent standard. Chris Sale on here did do me a good deal on them so it made sense to have them refurbished in '65 style & finish.
 

Nassau65

CCCUK Member
Yes porosity issues prevented '63 KO's being offered. The previous image I posted are of some I had diamond cut and powder coated and are on the silver '65 now. They were bare cast so '64 and yes the dirt and brake dust was baked into the rough texture and try as I did they couldn't be cleaned to any decent standard. Chris Sale on here did do me a good deal on them so it made sense to have them refurbished in '65 style & finish.
I thought the finish was nicer than standard. They look really good.
 

Mr. Cricket

Committee Member
I thought the finish was nicer than standard. They look really good.
They did a cracking job on 5 for £750.00. When I went to collect and pay he started off with they were a lot more work than we thought so naturally I suspected the cost to go up but they honoured the price saying that having done a set they could refine the process and turn them around quicker. Quality service

 

teamzr1

Supporting vendor
I think would be a better compare if the wheel and tire of top one was cleaned up, and also it has a higher sidewall than bottom one


cmpt.jpg
 

Nassau65

CCCUK Member
It was more of “the look” I was talking about. Do C2 knock off’s look good on C3’s. I’m on the fence on this one.
Re the actual finishes of the wheels, the 64 wheels get dirty and stain a lot easier than the 65/66 include 67 if you want. The black back finish looks better, and doesn’t show the dirt as much
 

Mr. Cricket

Committee Member
That’s the standard factory finish for 1964 style knock offs. The 65/66 were black with ally fin edges.
My mate Graham has a set of '64's on his SWC that look great but he keeps them spotless. They have wires on the spinner tied through a drilled hole in one of the fins from its days of racing. Cool stuff
 

Nassau65

CCCUK Member
I’ve seen a few that have had a low sheen lacquer put on them. Hardly notices and that helps resist the grime, and cleans off easily.
 

Nassau65

CCCUK Member
I know the 1967 bolt ons are thought of as the pick of the bunch off mid year wheels, but I love spinners. They have a fantastic look when the car is travelling a low speeds. You can really see the “spinner” spinning.
 

Nassau65

CCCUK Member
Anybody remember this series?
Max monroe Loose cannon
He used a 1964 convertible with hubcaps, later in the series it got knock offs. Then a C4 convertible in red appeared as his ride.
IMG_0030.jpeg
 
Top