teamzr1
Supporting vendor
For the first time since the anger of the Poll Tax riots during Margaret Thatcher’s time as Prime Minister or the anti-Iraq war demonstrations under Tony Blair, we are witnessing an outpouring of anger against the government.
In this case, it is anger at the anti-car measures by the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan.
Citizens are attacking and disabling the network of cameras in London that monitors all traffic and fine cars that do not meet certain standards.
The attack on the motorist in London goes back to 2003 when the then London Mayor, Ken Livingstone, implemented the Congestion Zone whereby drivers would have to pay to enter.
The public were told that this would cut congestion, but many felt it was just anyway to extract money from the motorist. Public transport in London is very good, but never before has there been a road charge in the UK. The London Congestion zone was, and probably still is, the largest in the world.
The next attack on motorists was the Low Emission Zone (LEZ) which was also introduced by Ken Livingstone in 2008 and was, as the name suggests, a charge/fine based on vehicle emissions. It was expanded a number of times and now covers all of London.
This was to target older trucks and large vehicles. Ken Livinstone was a Labour socialist mayor, but the next intrusion came from the so-called Conservative mayor of London, Boris Johnson.
In 2014 Boris announced the creation of the Ultra Low Emissions Zone (ULEZ) which was targeted at car drivers.
Five years later the ULEZ zone started in central London and older cars entered the zone to pay for the privilege of driving on London roads for that and every day. The cost of driving an older car into central London was now £12.50 for ULEZ and £15 for Congestion Charge. That’s over $30 a day to drive on a public road.
The fightback we are seeing today has been dubbed the ULES “Blade Runners.” Hundreds of the ULEZ cameras have been damaged or destroyed across London. Campaigners/vigilantes/angry citizens (take your pick) are cutting wires on the equipment and spraying the lenses with paint.
Up to a quarter of all the cameras have been attacked.
To combat this fight back, Sadiq Khan has employed an army of CCTV camera vans to drive around and fill these black spots.
But now we are seeing vans parking in front of these vans to block their camera and render them useless.
There is so much frustration against this onslaught in motorists that the legacy media is even running stories on the Blade Runners and interviewing them, so their story can get out. This “lawbreaking” seems to be championed by sections of the media, which is intriguing and encouraging.
The public has been invited to take part in consultations on the introduction of both of these charges, but the government was always going to implement them.
They claim it is about the environment, but it seems to be about something else, which the government are always short of. Money!
The congestion charge rakes in £220 million every year.
That's a quarter of a billion dollars every year. A quarter of that is used to administer the zone, but the rest is pure profit. A tax on the motorist.
The ULEZ expansion is estimated to net Sadiq Khan up to, £300m in its first year.
That's half a billion dollars a year.
Does anyone believe the lie that this is about saving the planet and nothing to do with raising more tax?
The attacks on this network are only increasing.
Not only are the public against the fines, but they are also against this new level of surveillance.
Sadiq Khan operates a network of 1544 Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras. ULEZ will add another 2700.
This level of intrusion is too much. Enough is enough.
In this case, it is anger at the anti-car measures by the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan.
Citizens are attacking and disabling the network of cameras in London that monitors all traffic and fine cars that do not meet certain standards.
The attack on the motorist in London goes back to 2003 when the then London Mayor, Ken Livingstone, implemented the Congestion Zone whereby drivers would have to pay to enter.
The public were told that this would cut congestion, but many felt it was just anyway to extract money from the motorist. Public transport in London is very good, but never before has there been a road charge in the UK. The London Congestion zone was, and probably still is, the largest in the world.
The next attack on motorists was the Low Emission Zone (LEZ) which was also introduced by Ken Livingstone in 2008 and was, as the name suggests, a charge/fine based on vehicle emissions. It was expanded a number of times and now covers all of London.
This was to target older trucks and large vehicles. Ken Livinstone was a Labour socialist mayor, but the next intrusion came from the so-called Conservative mayor of London, Boris Johnson.
In 2014 Boris announced the creation of the Ultra Low Emissions Zone (ULEZ) which was targeted at car drivers.
Five years later the ULEZ zone started in central London and older cars entered the zone to pay for the privilege of driving on London roads for that and every day. The cost of driving an older car into central London was now £12.50 for ULEZ and £15 for Congestion Charge. That’s over $30 a day to drive on a public road.
The fightback we are seeing today has been dubbed the ULES “Blade Runners.” Hundreds of the ULEZ cameras have been damaged or destroyed across London. Campaigners/vigilantes/angry citizens (take your pick) are cutting wires on the equipment and spraying the lenses with paint.
Up to a quarter of all the cameras have been attacked.
To combat this fight back, Sadiq Khan has employed an army of CCTV camera vans to drive around and fill these black spots.
But now we are seeing vans parking in front of these vans to block their camera and render them useless.
There is so much frustration against this onslaught in motorists that the legacy media is even running stories on the Blade Runners and interviewing them, so their story can get out. This “lawbreaking” seems to be championed by sections of the media, which is intriguing and encouraging.
The public has been invited to take part in consultations on the introduction of both of these charges, but the government was always going to implement them.
They claim it is about the environment, but it seems to be about something else, which the government are always short of. Money!
The congestion charge rakes in £220 million every year.
That's a quarter of a billion dollars every year. A quarter of that is used to administer the zone, but the rest is pure profit. A tax on the motorist.
The ULEZ expansion is estimated to net Sadiq Khan up to, £300m in its first year.
That's half a billion dollars a year.
Does anyone believe the lie that this is about saving the planet and nothing to do with raising more tax?
The attacks on this network are only increasing.
Not only are the public against the fines, but they are also against this new level of surveillance.
Sadiq Khan operates a network of 1544 Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras. ULEZ will add another 2700.
This level of intrusion is too much. Enough is enough.
