I cannot see trying to do apples to apples compare with 2 different engine designs and carbs
I suspect Mike maybe trying to dial in a workaround to either an existing problem or is not seeing that his CAM design along
with engine compression etc., just will require more or less air and/or more timing to makeup for any vacuum loss due to the CAM grind or
there is some leak
Doing a workaround and if there is a problem, and it gets worse than he is back to ground one in retuning after the problem is solved
Should be very easy to rig up a tee to put a vacuum gauge in series with the engine and the distributor
and see how his engine compares with GMs spec for that stock engine
These tests should be easy to do and benchmark than to GM specs below
Starting with cold and hot idle values
The table below lists vacuum ranges for most engines:
Engine Function | Vacuum Range |
Cranking | 3-5 in. Hg |
Idle | 14-20 in. Hg |
Cruising | 10-15 in. Hg |
Deceleration | 21-25 in. Hg |