Looking good Tim, removing and re fitting engines is always a thrill for a petrol head diy’erHandy having a removeable crossmember, often wonder why chevrolet didnt do it on manual cars. The four speed is more engaging than an auto imho and was a pre requisite of cars I considered. Re the clutch, when the car arrived at southampton I was amazed at how heavy the clutch felt after modern cars and vans with hydraulic Ones. But after a few hundred miles I dont even think about it now. The same with my non power brakes, first drive it felt a bit un nerving and before I drove properly on the road I was considering a power brake conversion, the vendor in the USA had told me he had never had a problem stopping the car and I can confirm having about 350 miles under my belt that the brakes are excellent , you just get used to using more force but like the clutch they feel normal now. They brake with good “feel” total confidence and dead straight and even . The handbrake tho , thats another story and is a work in progress.Hi Corvette, Many thanks for the technical guidance on this - you have also solved a small mystery that I had forgotten about
When I first got the car home I investigated the CKX engine code - which showed up as being for a Turbo Hydramatic transmission. I had put this down as a question for me to resolve at a later - and then forgot about it. (also possibly explains why the hole in the floor for the gear level has been modded). I have also looked at the serial number P1B16A on the transmission casing (serial # 3925661) which identifies it as a standard M20 gearbox build on the 16 Feb 1971. So someone at some point swapped the original automatic for this manual (see pic below).
Ironically, after I bought the car but before it was delivered I discovered that I have severe arthritis in my knees and I was regretting not buying an automatic - turns out that I did.
So that leaves an interesting dilemma bearing in mind that either option will require some spend: should I rebuild what I have or should I rebuild as it should be?
How light or heavy is a standard clutch on a stock small block in good working order?
View attachment 8041
Be careful what you wish for! I'm not sure anyone has an appetite for another 40 pictures whilst I rebuild the passenger side.No need to stop with the seat pictures!
You are going to love itMany thanks! From my novice perspective having a removable cross member made everything relatively easy to do. I made a trolley (out of an old kitchen worktop) to support and move the gearbox as it was coming out and that really helped too. I had been wondering about clutch effort as my knees are probably going to replaced sometime this year and a heavy clutch won't help. It's interesting to hear your experience with this - although is is perhaps difficult to gauge light and heavy as everyone's experiences and perceptions are different. Thinking about this I realise I haven't driven a manual for a few years now, so that will be refreshing and very welcome especially after using VW group DSG auto boxes for a few years which personally I don't rate very highly. It will be interesting to see what mine is like when everything goes back together.
Perhaps my experience with manuals will help Tim. I had a lower disc removed about 15 years ago and was left with permanent nerve damage to my left ankle. I can't 'pivot' my foot upwards (so unable to shift-up gears on Jap and late model bikes) The clutches on modern manual gearboxes in typical daily drivers are an issue for me as I can't 'feel' the clutch biting point through my left foot - so choose an auto for preference. My Vette is a manual. I replaced the OEM or pattern original clutch with a Centerforce dual friction assembly when I uprated the engine. This clutch (whilst rated as capable of handling 600+ hp) is actually lighter in operation than the stock type clutch (oddly some of the perfromance versions of the C6 have lighter clutches than the stock version). My C3 has power steering - but with a 12.5" steering wheel the physical effort is increased to (IMHO) a perfect weight, matching the effort of the clutch and the non power assisted brakes. Yes are heavy, very heavy I guess and need a bit of warming-up with the Hawk HP pads - but again the braking weight is a reasonable comparison for the steering and clutch (although admittedly more powerful brakes would be nice)Many thanks! From my novice perspective having a removable cross member made everything relatively easy to do. I made a trolley (out of an old kitchen worktop) to support and move the gearbox as it was coming out and that really helped too. I had been wondering about clutch effort as my knees are probably going to replaced sometime this year and a heavy clutch won't help. It's interesting to hear your experience with this - although is is perhaps difficult to gauge light and heavy as everyone's experiences and perceptions are different. Thinking about this I realise I haven't driven a manual for a few years now, so that will be refreshing and very welcome especially after using VW group DSG auto boxes for a few years which personally I don't rate very highly. It will be interesting to see what mine is like when everything goes back together.
Good to see another person who specced only manual gearbox - just like me.The four speed is more engaging than an auto imho and was a pre requisite of cars I considered. Re the clutch, when the car arrived at southampton I was amazed at how heavy the clutch felt after modern cars and vans with hydraulic Ones. But after a few hundred miles I dont even think about it now. The same with my non power brakes, first drive it felt a bit un nerving and before I drove properly on the road I was considering a power brake conversion, the vendor in the USA had told me he had never had a problem stopping the car and I can confirm having about 350 miles under my belt that the brakes are excellent
That's good to know- thanks! Would you recommend the Centerforce clutch for a stock application? I need to get a new clutch and if this one is lighter than standard that would be a good plus point for me.Perhaps my experience with manuals will help Tim. I had a lower disc removed about 15 years ago and was left with permanent nerve damage to my left ankle. I can't 'pivot' my foot upwards (so unable to shift-up gears on Jap and late model bikes) The clutches on modern manual gearboxes in typical daily drivers are an issue for me as I can't 'feel' the clutch biting point through my left foot - so choose an auto for preference. My Vette is a manual. I replaced the OEM or pattern original clutch with a Centerforce dual friction assembly when I uprated the engine. This clutch (whilst rated as capable of handling 600+ hp) is actually lighter in operation than the stock type clutch (oddly some of the perfromance versions of the C6 have lighter clutches than the stock version). My C3 has power steering - but with a 12.5" steering wheel the physical effort is increased to (IMHO) a perfect weight, matching the effort of the clutch and the non power assisted brakes. Yes are heavy, very heavy I guess and need a bit of warming-up with the Hawk HP pads - but again the braking weight is a reasonable comparison for the steering and clutch (although admittedly more powerful brakes would be nice)
I find the low seating position in the Vette with my legs stretched horizontally really comfortable - but do have a habit of 'riding' the clutch at times. Don't really have driving issues otherwise even though living in an outer London suburb.