My Top Gear experience was far worse , at least initially . BBC would not pay expenses to the dozens of car owners of all the marques and model variations they wanted for filming in the old empty TVR works in Blackpool . That meant a 380 mile round trip for me in a V8 Marcos at my own expense !! I said NO as no overnight accommodation was offered either despite them saying filming might go on until late . In the end the Beeb agreed to expenses and overnight in a Travel Lodge but I was not to mention it to other owners as "they will all want it " . One poor guy drove all the way from the South Coast in his Triumph TR3 !!Ah photoshoots. Fun experience, but the only one I did was for Autotrader. Drove my C3 up to them, using a lot of V8 fuel I didn't get re-imbursed for, they said in advance. I didn't mind, it was going to be fun filming etc.
On the day, starter motor plays up, get it started though eventually.
Get to the place just before filming time. They then faff round and go to lunch - I could have turned up much later.
Anyway, they film with the actor and take photos and lots of other stuff. All good.... except..... the only bit of footage used was a close up of the actor in the car, through the windscreen. So you can't tell what car he is driving or anything. They may as well have just put him in a Vectra and filmed him for 2 seconds.
Waste of a day off work for me, money, and a lot of time and concern that I was going to be stranded because of my starter. At least with the film crew we could push start it (manual), but if it cut out on the way there or back then I would be stuffed.
Still, it was interesting to see how these things get filmed etc, seeing behind the scenes etc.
Yeah, I have vague recollections of you telling me the story before. Sounds really bad. I mean these people are using car fans to make a profit / show with no regard to recompense, let alone actually giving a bit more to make it worthwhile to the owner. Imagine if the actors and film crew etc weren't paid, and were just asked to show up etc.My Top Gear experience was far worse
That is a great shot of Red! How can just a 1/3 rd of a car look soooo good?? Seriously thinking of going down the rack routeI
did one with Remington razors maybe 2016 and they paid me £500 back then, provided lunch and gave me some of the products - men's groomer type things. Interesting watching it play out but long-winded and quite boring after they do the same shot 20 times
View attachment 29195
I
did one with Remington razors maybe 2016 and they paid me £500 back then, provided lunch and gave me some of the products - men's groomer type things. Interesting watching it play out but long-winded and quite boring after they do the same shot 20 times
View attachment 29195
I
did one with Remington razors maybe 2016 and they paid me £500 back then, provided lunch and gave me some of the products - men's groomer type things. Interesting watching it play out but long-winded and quite boring after they do the same shot 20 times
View attachment 29195
`Nuff said !Continuing the theme...
Last summer I was approached by an agency that provides cars for shows and this one was for celeb antiques. They wouldn't divulge who the celebs would be but offered excellent remuneration including £750.00 for 1 1/2 days, paid hotel, evening meal and a mileage allowance. Lots of too & fro choosing the car after providing several photo's they said would it be ok if one of the celebs carries a very small dog while in the car. Sure I said as we like the doggies and can we sit a small doggy cage on the back seat he asked? *click*
Thank mate but that '72 is long gone now over the border into white rose country. Now luggage racks. I wouldn't not buy a C3 if it had a rack fitted but I would deffo not fit one to a non rack Corvette. Just my opinion of course and chrome 6 fixings and make sure you don't block the gas cap cover from openingThat is a great shot of Red! How can just a 1/3 rd of a car look soooo good?? Seriously thinking of going down the rack routeI love a C3 with or without it but it would also take the eyes off some sunken production marks from the not brilliant pre paint prep. Best rack? Chrome or stainless ? , leaning toward chrome for originality how many fixings? Best make ?
![]()
That was always my thoughts too but every now and again I see one that just looks right. Maybe I will buy a second hand one , then just place it in situ when it’s in the vette room and pop it on the bench when I go out for a drive!! . Best of both worlds and no holes in the deck !Thank mate but that '72 is long gone now over the border into white rose country. Now luggage racks. I wouldn't not buy a C3 if it had a rack fitted but I would deffo not fit one to a non rack Corvette. Just my opinion of course and chrome 6 fixings and make sure you don't block the gas cap cover from opening![]()
I’ve know a few people who’ve done that unfortunatelyThank mate but that '72 is long gone now over the border into white rose country. Now luggage racks. I wouldn't not buy a C3 if it had a rack fitted but I would deffo not fit one to a non rack Corvette. Just my opinion of course and chrome 6 fixings and make sure you don't block the gas cap cover from opening![]()
What a bunch of cowboys !! But I have heard similar stories about these resto gangs .On the subject of these car resto 'shows', I'm minded of the show that 'restored' Pete Knodt's '74 big block coupe. I invited the production team along to a regional meeting - no real issues there.....team later spoke with me re. what Pete would have wanted from his car (we both had very similar 'goals') and I knew exactly what he wanted to do with the car. This was all noted by the production team (and duly ignored). I've mentioned it before but the production team get a member of the recipients family to sign a contract. This has a 'gagging' clause that specifically excludes any discussions with media organisations (other than themselves) and effectively allows then to do what they want with the vehicle, minimising any comebacks from the family or owner of the car when returned after 'restoration'.
Petes' brother was the 'family' member. He is a shrewd solicitor and refused to sign their documentation as presented utill a number of changes had been made.
It didn't get signed-off until close (or even after) the car was returned to Pete. So many people had involvement with the resto, seemingly as individuals one after the other were unable to do the work. Gearbox issues, exhaust issues, wiring issues, trim issues were all encountered and most the people brought-in seemed totally out of their depth. They even removed the hi-stall torque converter and replaced with stock. Returning home with the car after the 'unveiling' at Brands Hatch Pete experienced major brake failure. Reason - new front calipers had been installed, but calipers 'halves' hadn't been torque-up before installation. There was a catalogue of other issues, So guy's and gal's - if you are unfortunate enough to fall ill at some point and unable to start (or complete) a resto of your classic car best give careful thought about telling your close family perhaps to carefully consider contacting one of these shows on your behalf?
Sounds familiar to me too .I think I remember that one, a black car. They butchered the front wings to fix the birdcage I seem to remember.
I must admit I've often wondered just what you get back after consigning your (potential) pride and joy to one of the car resto shows. Having sought shelter indoors today from my freezing garage I was idly watching an episode of 'Car SOS' presented by Tim Shaw and Fuzz Townshend. The duo rescue and restore cars whose owners have suffered some health crisis preventing them from carrying out the work themselves. The programme hinges on the fact that the owner is totally unaware that the work is being carried out, friends or family having contacted the show in secret .On the subject of these car resto 'shows', I'm minded of the show that 'restored' Pete Knodt's '74 big block coupe. I invited the production team along to a regional meeting - no real issues there.....team later spoke with me re. what Pete would have wanted from his car (we both had very similar 'goals') and I knew exactly what he wanted to do with the car. This was all noted by the production team (and duly ignored). I've mentioned it before but the production team get a member of the recipients family to sign a contract. This has a 'gagging' clause that specifically excludes any discussions with media organisations (other than themselves) and effectively allows then to do what they want with the vehicle, minimising any comebacks from the family or owner of the car when returned after 'restoration'.